Changelog
Product evolution notes for the ABS Core runtime governance project.
Changelog
This changelog distinguishes between:
- implemented runtime changes,
- deployment-specific capabilities,
- early-access items,
- and product direction.
It should not be read as proof that every item below is production-ready across all deployment models.
v3.5.0 — Sovereign Accountability Release (Mar 2026)
- Unified Global Identity: Consensus on v3.5.0 across all components (Landing, Docs, CLI).
- Emoji Purge: Replaced status emojis with professional [OK]/[WIP] technical markers.
- Runtime Hardening: Enhanced deterministic integrity for enterprise deployments.
- Sovereign Memory: Implementation of Persistent Context Pack (INV-004).
v3.0.0 — Production Alignment (Feb 2026)
This release focused on consolidating positioning, runtime boundaries, and technical narrative around ABS Core as a runtime governance infrastructure project.
- Clarified ABS Core as a runtime governance layer.
- Improved documentation around deployment scope, latency interpretation, and evidence boundaries.
- Distinguished implemented core behavior from early-access capabilities.
- Continued work on audit integrity and deployment models.
v2.8.0 — Enterprise Beta (Dec 2025)
- Added team/session-oriented enterprise support paths.
- Introduced stronger audit-chain and ledger-oriented runtime concepts.
- Expanded experimentation around semantic or risk-based analysis.
Interpretation note: beta-stage and evaluation-stage capabilities may require customer-specific validation before use in production governance paths.
v3.0.0 — Edge Pivot (Nov 2025)
- Migrated the runtime direction toward edge-oriented deployment.
- Expanded event persistence and logging support for governed execution paths.
v1.0.0 — Initial Core Release (Oct 2025)
- Initial release of the ABS Engine.
- Basic proxy and early policy enforcement foundations.
Reading guide
When reviewing older change entries, use the following interpretation:
- A named capability may indicate implementation work, partial availability, or product direction.
- Deployment-sensitive features should not be assumed to exist identically in every customer topology.
- Security, compliance, and sovereignty claims always depend on the actual runtime path, integration depth, and environment configuration.